Climate Feedback: Another day, another ‘climate-gate’ inquiry
In a statement circulated by the Science Media Centre, Bob Ward, of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, says, “We will now see predictable attempts by so-called ‘sceptics’ to discredit the panel before it has even started work so that its findings can be conveniently dismissed unless it hands a propaganda goal to those who promote denial and complacency about the causes and consequences of climate change. But nobody should be in doubt that this is a high-quality panel of individuals who have demonstrated both their authority and integrity.”- Bishop Hill blog - Emmanuel on the Climategate emails
Reader Mac notes Kerry Emmanuel's comments on the Climategate emails, delivered at an MIT debate on the subject:- Bishop Hill blog - Oxburgh's conflict of interest"What we have here," says Kerry Emanuel, are "thousands of emails collectively showing scientists hard at work, trying to figure out the meaning of evidence that confronts them. Among a few messages, there are a few lines showing the human failings of a few scientists…" Emanuel believes that "scientifically, it means nothing," because the controversy doesn't challenge the overwhelming evidence supporting anthropogenic warming. He is far more concerned with the well-funded "public relations campaign" to drown out or distort the message of climate science, which he links to "interests where billions, even trillions are at stake..." This "machine … has been highly successful in branding climate scientists as a bunch of sandal-wearing, fruit-juice drinking leftist radicals engaged in a massive conspiracy to return us to agrarian society…"
Commenters are also noting the background of Ron Oxburgh, the chairman of the RS panel. Lord Oxburgh is:
* President of the Carbon Capture and Storage Association
* Chairman of wind energy firm Falck Renewables
* A member of the Green Fiscal Commission
No comments:
Post a Comment