Feeding Back Nonsense | Real Science

Hansen says that ice ages are driven by very small changes in Earth’s orbit, which get massively multiplied by changes in greenhouse gases (i.e H2O and CO2.)

However, when talking about solar “forcings” the story is different. Hansen says that changes in the sun’s output are “too small” to have much effect on the climate.

So why doesn’t he believe in the same massive solar feedback as he claims for orbital cycles and small increases in CO2? Is feedback somehow prejudiced against the Sun?

C3: A Failed Climate Prediction Twofer: Global Warming Alarmists Get Both Droughts and Floods Wrong

Another example is the prediction that global warming will cause contemporaneously drought and flood conditions. Because skeptics possess objective analysis characteristics, combined with rational common sense traits that favor actual empirical science, the predictions of simultaneous drought and flood conditions seemed to be obviously bogus scare-predictions. As it so commonly happens, a new peer-reviewed study determines the skeptics' hard-wired bogus B.S. detectors were correct and the 'crooks & liars' alarmists were wrong, again.

EU Referendum: Winter Weather Awareness Week

In an almost perfect parody of themselves, the warmists are seriously telling us that colder winters could be a sign of global warming. This is just as well because the Scots are being warned that this winter could be worse than last year's record-breaking cold snap.
...
Fortunately, the warmists are so closeted in their towers of unreality that they have not the first idea quite how stupid they look, or how their pronouncements are treated by ordinary mortals – mostly with derision.