Saturday, October 22, 2011

Another inconvenient truth: The National Audubon Society folks clearly don't actually believe in their own global warming hoax propaganda

For a while now, the Audubon folks have been telling us that emitting CO2 is a very evil thing to do.

A book (The Big Year) was written about three birders who needlessly burn an absolutely enormous amount of fossil fuel (on long-haul flights, rental cars, airboats, etc).

When the book is turned into a movie, does Audubon take a strong stand, telling us that emitting CO2 is still evil, even if you do it as part of their favorite hobby?

The answer is a resounding "No". Not only does Audubon fail to condemn this movie, they have reportedly sunk six figures into the Fox marketing effort.

This underlines the biggest problem for global warming hoax promoters: The underlying premise of CAGW is so stupid that not even the "believers" truly believe in it.


CBS: Cutting Greenhouse Emissions Needed to Save Birds from Global Warming | NewsBusters.org
"Here in California, Audubon scientists went beyond measuring bird movement to look for solutions. They found that reducing the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming could make a dramatic difference for many birds."
An open letter to Secretary Clinton: KO Keystone XL | National Audubon Society
For climate change, the news is even worse. One of the world’s foremost climate experts, NASA’s James Hansen, calls it “essentially game over” for the climate if we allow Alberta Tar Sands to be developed.

Last year, we all saw both the hottest year on record and the greatest amount of global warming pollution in history. Extreme weather events are taking place around the world...
'Big Year' pushes for the birds
In fact, Audubon has sunk six figures into the Fox marketing effort -- which includes media kits, private screenings in 20 cities and a massive social media effort that launches Oct. 10 -- in a push to attract the 48 million birders in America, as estimated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

No comments: