Thursday, November 24, 2011

It's all so confusing: After warmist Gore declared the debate over in 1992, warmist Mann suggests we should have a robust debate now?

Twitter / @MichaelEMann: Good editorial on #CRUHack ...

Good editorial on in The Economist: emails actually show science working as it should (robust debate, etc.)

Flashback:  They call this a consensus?

 "Only an insignificant fraction of scientists deny the global warming crisis. The time for debate is over. The science is settled."

So said Al Gore ... in 1992. Amazingly, he made his claims despite much evidence of their falsity.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Hasn't Mann and RealClimate been trying to convince us for years that the science was settled and couldn't be debated?