cc: Gavin Schmidt date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:47:02 -0400 from: Michael Mann subject: Re: A couple of things to: Phil Jones
Hi Phil, Seems to me that CRU should charge him a fee for the service. He shouldn't be under the assumption that he has the right to demand reports be scanned in for him on a whim. CRU should require reasonable monetary compensation for the labor, effort (and postage!). It this were a colleague acting in good faith, I'd say do it at no cost. But of, course, he's not. He's not interested in the truth here, he's just looking for another way to try to undermine confidence in our science. Henry's review looks helpful and easy to deal w/. Will be interesting to see the other reviews. I guess you're going to get your moneys' worth out of your scanner, mike
Phil Jones wrote:
1. This email came to CRU last night. From: Steve McIntyre [ mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 5:09 PM To: email@example.com Subject: Farmer et al 1989 Dear Sir, Can you please send me a pdf of the Farmer et al 1989, cited in Folland andPArker 1995, which, in turn is cited in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Thanks, Steve McIntyre
Who’s really waging the ‘war on science’?
1 hour ago