Heartland leaker comes clean, stirs ethical debate | 89.3 KPCC

So, what’s the real story here? Heartland’s education agenda? Or Gleick’s failure of integrity? Most scientists agree that climate change is real and it’s manmade. If that’s the case, did Gleick’s ends justify the means? And what of Dr. Glieck himself? He testified to congress about scientific ethics, he wrote about the subject a lot. Did he snap?

...Scott Mandia, Professor of Physical Sciences, Suffolk County Community College; co-founder of the Climate Science Rapid Response Team, a group that connects climate scientists to lawmakers and the media.

Judith Curry, Chair, School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology

Why target Heartland? | Climate Etc.

So, imagine you are a climate scientist and climate change ideologue, and want to “take down” the single organization (or individual) that is doing the most damage to the movement (i.e. with the end result of thwarting CO2 emissions/stabilization policy).  Who would you target?

NASA Data Show Clouds Are Losing Altitude – “May Represent A Negative Feedback Mechanism” – Confirms Lindzen

NASA has recently issued a press release, here. A recent study by Davies & Molloy (2012) appearing in the Geophysical Research Letters shows that clouds have gotten lower over the first decade of this century.

Michael Mann: The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars

WPSU’s Patty Satalia talks with the Penn State Professor about his new book, The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars.

Desperate Climate Liars And Thiefs In Their Death Throes | Real Science

How long are these people going to maintain positions of authority where they can continue to cheat, steal and lie to/from their constituents?