http://www.huffingtonpost.com/blackberry/p.html?id=1392683
Mann: In Obama's second State of the Union address, he actually seemed to concede the scientific evidence as a weakness. He argued that we need to pursue a more enlightened energy strategy in spite of the doubts about the science of climate change. … We've actually made negative progress from where we were 10 years earlier, when Clinton gave his final State of the Union address. We've gone from the science being the primary reason to move forward to the argument that we should move forward in spite of supposed weaknesses in the science of climate change. So we've retreated to a position of weakness on this issue with Obama relative to Bill Clinton.
French Nuclear: End of the Line?
3 hours ago
2 comments:
wasnt it bill clinton that didnt ratify Kyoto? Mann is such a nebbish and nerd...
Ah, the lame duck address from President happy pants.
Jeez, who could forget that one?
Post a Comment