Friday, May 25, 2012

- Bishop Hill blog - Science communicator, heal thyself

...Isn't that odd? In climate science, it is the sceptics who are challenging scientists. It is sceptics who have opened the subject to the public. And the sci comms community has been at the forefront of efforts to cheerlead for the mainstream, to ignored vested interests, to shut down debate, to argue from authority, and to keep dissent off the airwaves.

The New Nostradamus of the North: Wind turbines kill hundreds of thousands of bats

It is a well-known fact that wind turbines kill hundreds of thousands of birds every year. Now it is becoming clear that these expensive, ugly and inefficient machines also kill a huge number of bats:

150,000 more US heat deaths projected by 2100 | JunkScience.com

Stupid PlayStation® climatological “prediction” of no factual value whatsoever. Moreover, making energy too expensive and/or unavailable will kill a lot more than that guesstimate, as will continuing to trash the economy and employment.

THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: Famed hurricane forecaster Dr. William Gray predicts below-average hurricane activity for 2012 & global cooling over next 20 years

Famed hurricane forecaster Dr. William Gray has issued his hurricane season forecast for 2012 and predicts below-average probability for major hurricanes making landfall.  Dr. Gray is Professor Emeritus, Dept of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University and a skeptic of man-made global warming. Dr. Gray contends that the global ocean's natural Meridional Overturning Circulation (MOC) "is the likely cause of most of the global warming that has been observed since the start of the industrial revolution (~1850) and for the more recent global warming that has occurred since the mid-1970s." In his paper, "Climate Change: Driven by the Ocean not Human Activity," Dr. Gray notes that observations show tropospheric water vapor has decreased with increased CO2, the opposite of the assumptions programmed into climate models, thus, "The predicted global warming due to a doubling of CO2 has been erroneously exaggerated by the [climate models] due to this water vapor feedback."

No comments: