Prof Antonino Zichichi (of anti-matter fame) is angry at climate science « JoNova: Science, carbon, climate and tax

[Monckton] Nowhere is the buying of desired results by governments clearer than in Nick Stern’s now-discredited report of 2006 on climate economics. The U.N.’s absurd climate panel had already at least tripled the true (and harmless) rate of warming to be expected from our adding CO2 to the air. Stern, to please his socialist paymasters, tripled it again without the slightest justification. Then he divided by 10 the true cost of making global warming go away and multiplied by 10 the true cost of not acting to Save The Planet

Twitter / [Warmist Paul Douglas; real name Douglas Paul Kruhoeffer]

Gravity is a hoax. Good, now maybe I'll get more media attention. Climate deniers sound increasingly shrill & moronic pic.twitter.com/NOSmrzGO

In Defense of Science: An Interview with NCSE’s Eugenie Scott | KQED QUEST

[Scott] once we get that consensus, once scientists have arm wrestled over this new explanation and we’ve tested it up one side and down another and it goes into that core, then we stop arguing about it. This is where we are with evolution and climate change and the basic theory of vaccination

Hey Eugenie: How, specifically, has climate science been "tested up one side and down the other"?