The IPCC’s Political Chairman | NoFrakkingConsensus
History will not be kind to this organization. The IPCC is a case study in how a UN body took a particular set of political and philosophical beliefs about humanity’s interaction with the environment – and dressed them up as science.Private funds for new climate think tank to keep public informed | Knox Weekly
The decision to create the Australian Climate Council, as the group will now be known, was spurred by ''a groundswell of support'' across the country, Professor Flannery said.Roger Pielke Jr.'s Blog: What was the IPCC AR4 Most Certain About?
''We've developed a real reputation for independence and authority in this area, and we just want to continue with that job. We haven't seen any plans from the government to provide an alternative,'' he said.
With attention focused on the release later this week of the Working Group I report of Fifth Assessment of the IPCC, I thought that it would be worthwhile to present the findings of Working Group I from the Fourth Assessment (AR4) which were expressed with the greatest certainty, that is with 95% confidence or greater.World leaders demand climate action as UN General Assembly begins
“The time for radical leadership on climate change is now. With 2015 set as the deadline for both a new climate agreement and the post-2015 development agenda, we are at the point in human development when we need to act to protect,” said Mary Robinson.
Posts
1 comment:
"The decision to create the Australian Climate Council, as the group will now be known, was spurred by ''a groundswell of support'' across the country, Professor Flannery said."
Too bad that groundswell of support didn't materialize last week, the Eco-Weenies might have won the election.
Post a Comment