Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Warmist Dan Kahan is surprised and "a little embarrassed" to find out that identifying with the Tea Party correlates positively with scores on science comprehension

Some data on education, religiosity, ideology, and science comprehension
identifying with the Tea Party correlates positively (r = 0.05, p = 0.05) with scores on the science comprehension measure:
I've got to confess, though, I found this result surprising. As I pushed the button to run the analysis on my computer, I fully expected I'd be shown a modest negative correlation between identifying with the Tea Party and science comprehension.

But then again, I don't know a single person who identifies with the Tea Party. All my impressions come from watching cable tv -- & I don't watch Fox News very often -- and reading the "paper" (New York Times daily, plus a variety of politics-focused internet sites like Huffington Post & Politico).

I'm a little embarrassed, but mainly I'm just glad that I no longer hold this particular mistaken view.

Of course, I still subscribe to my various political and moral assessments--all very negative-- of what I understand the "Tea Party movement" to stand for. I just no long assume that the people who happen to hold those values are less likely than people who share my political outlooks to have acquired the sorts of knowledge and dispositions that a decent science comprehension scale measures.  [Via Paul Matthews]
Dan M. Kahan | Yale Law School
Dan Kahan is the Elizabeth K. Dollard Professor of Law and Professor of Psychology at Yale Law School. In addition to risk perception, his areas of research


papertiger said...

Holding tight to his other mistaken views and prejudices.
What a putz.

Anonymous said...

As a highly educated man, no doubt he identifies with fascist power of the state instead of simply American liberty like "The Tea Party: Three Principles," by constitutional law professor Elizabeth Price Foley.