Why did warmist Matthew England deny the dud predictions he now concedes? | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog: "Those models have actually vastly overestimated the warming, but England still wants us to have “confidence” in them. Could his own “wanting” explain why England vilified sceptics as liars for saying what he now admits is true: that the warming of the world’s atmosphere has paused for at least 13 years, contrary to the IPCC predictions?
How can we trust him? And will he say sorry?"
Fianlly: peer reviewed pushback against the Lew paper
19 minutes ago