Monday, March 16, 2009

Objectivist Individualist: A Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming Denier
Any warming that is caused by man, is probably the cause of more good than bad. The higher CO2 concentrations in the air are certainly good for plant growth, which is good for both man and other animals. As I have pointed out before, most of the predicted warming is in the northern parts of North America, northern Europe, northern Russia, northern China, northern Japan, southern Chile, and southern Argentina, all of which would benefit from warmer temperatures in the winter and at nights, which appears to be when the warming is greatest. This makes life in these areas easier for man, animals, and plants in most cases. This is not a bad outcome and it most certainly is not a catastrophe!
AgWired » Blog Archives » A Few Thoughts On Global Warming
I don’t know why I let things like the global warming hoax bother me but sometimes . . .
...
So what does this say after 20+ years of irresponsible media exaggeration of the issue? It tells me a few things: that there is no such thing as a dominant “mainstream media” any more that captivates the news-consuming public. That while it’s nice to have one of these news outlets do your story, it’s not vital, and it’s not necessary to agonize over whether they do so or not. That these historically well-known news outlets are not only losing readership and revenues because of advertising losses, but because of credibility loss and disconnect with their communities. News consumers are smarter these days and know how to detect biased reporting, and they are not buying the product any more. With the speed and efficiency of the Web, it almost doesn’t matter any more where your information gets published; it’s that it does get published, gets found by a few key constituents, and gets launched from there.

1 comment:

Charles R. Anderson, Ph.D. said...

Thanks for the quote Tom. It is good to have allies in this very important fight to end the hysteria of the anthropogenic global warming conjecture. Killing our freedoms, our use of energy, and our civilization in the name of half-baked ideas is insane. Besides, I just find it disgusting when scientists are incompetent and try to use pseudo-science to drive a political agenda.

Charles R. Anderson, Ph.D.
http://ObjectivistIndividualist.blogspot.com