CRU Refuses FOI Request « Climate Audit – mirror site
...the chronology of this most recent refusal is, to say the least, interesting.The Harry Read_Me File « Climate Audit – mirror site
...
The file contained emails up to and including Nov 12, 2009 (the most recent is 1258053464.txt) the day prior to the date on the letter refusing the appeal.
Housekeeping emails are absent from the file. In addition, the file contains statements by Jones that he had “deleted loads of emails” (1228330629.txt) and a request from Jones to Mann to “delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4″, noting that similar requests were being made to Briffa, Wahl and Ammann (1212073451.txt).
A CA reader has organized the Harry_Read_Me file here. Take a look.Dr R K Pachauri: Now throwing climate change fraud under the bus?!
And we thought GISTEMP was bad. And it’s not like the underlying calculations are very complicated.
The Copenhagen Conference of the Parties to come up with an agreement on climate change is clearly not making much headway. This may be the result of frozen mindsets, strong vested interests and ignorance. The question is whether the additional time that the world would now have to arrive at an agreement at the next Conference of the Parties in Mexico will give us time and space to look at the larger problem of unsustainable development, of which climate change is at best a symptom. Human society cannot continue to ignore the vital dependence that exists between human welfare and the health of our natural resources.
Posts
2 comments:
Very interesting statement from Mr P. I wonder if this indicates a green left strategic withdrawl ?
If so, then I find it hard to see how the green political mvmt can ever recover. They've had credibility issues before, but this time they've bet the house and the farm on AGW.
Remember the environmentalist movement is older than the climate change scam - it existed before, only it was riding different horses.
If CO2/Climate change doesn't work anymore, rest assured they're already planning the next campaign, that could be "peak energy" or maybe the good old "ozone hole" again. The excuse for their agenda changes, but the agenda remains.
Post a Comment