Nenana Ice: Very thick, and getting thicker
3-Feb 44 InchesAmerican Thinker: The Left's Great Motivator
18-Feb 50 Inches
The anthropogenic global warming scandal illustrates how leftist ideologues in the government, environmental, scientific, and academic communities and non-governmental organizations work in concert to ensure a specific outcome: worldwide acceptance of AGW. Leftist ideologues have influenced scientists, falsified data, broken laws, and conspired with other entities to ensure AGW's acceptance. Moreover, government policy based on AGW acceptance provides an opportunity to institute new laws and regulations ensuring the leftist's outcomes is successfully implemented. American Thinker's environmental editor Marc Sheppard documented the outright lies, deceptions, and criminal activity involved in the AGW scam.Global Warming: "We Simply May Not Have The Power" | Voxy.co.nz
The alternative scientific explanations for global change suggests “we simply may not have the power” to create global warming. The ancient question that haunts mankind returns - can we humble our egos enough to appreciate that the world does not revolve around us? Some are attributing altered global temperatures to factors completely out of our control – gravity, planets, and the sun.A life in the day of an Inuit woman - Times Online
It is in our culture to kill polar bears.Roof crashes down on Farmington buses - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Throughout the region, heavy accumulations of snow and ice are causing roofs to come crashing down.Climate Security: How to Frame a Winning Argument « It’s [allegedly] Getting Hot In Here
...have you ever tried to “lay out the facts” to a climate skeptic? You probably didn’t get very far. Likely, regardless of what you said, they countered with some unfounded argument. In the end they weren’t swayed and you were left frustrated because they couldn’t see the logic behind your brilliant argument. Why did your facts fail to convince them?
...
We should begin using a term such as “climate security” to explain what we are advocating.
Posts
1 comment:
About the it's allegedly getting hot in here blog, they think renaming climate change to something more appealing is the answer. They came up with {drum roll please} "Climate Security". Ta dahhhhhhhh.
Whoooooeeee look at that.
You have to admit it's better then Freidman's "global weirding", more likely to peal off fence sitters then the overly precise "climate change" (so restricting that one was), light years better then the dreaded "global warming" that Al Gore saddled them with.
Speaking of saddled, the allegedly hot people also advise ditching the term "cap and trade" instead urging the more useful "saddling the market".
Ah well. I'll let you be the judge. It's kind of interesting though, a blog advising others on the best way to argue with me, the skeptic, doesn't allow comments.
Go figure.
Post a Comment