Weird science? Or, the beat goes on, II | CLIMATEGATE

Sounds again like they are trying to keep on getting funded and they realize “the sky is falling” isn’t going to work anymore.

Jeremy Clarkson's words of wisdom - 27th February 2010 The Sun | Climate Realists

...You'd imagine then, it would be time for the scientist to shut up shop and work on something a bit more important - like - space travel, or a cure for the cold.

But no, an international group of experts has been employed - at our expense - to spend the next three years analysing temperature records over the past 150 years to see what's what.

What's the point of that? The Met Office says they will ultimately conclude that man is causing global warming and we'll be back to square one.

There's another point, though. The planet is 4,500 million years old. So looking at its health for the past 150 years is pointless.

You may as well try to work out how well a 45-year-old man is by examining his behavioral patterns over the last two seconds.

EU Referendum: The turning tide

Paul Mulshine takes apart the Railway Engineer, while The Washington Post debunks "green" jobs. There are too many signs to conclude other than that the tide is turning. It will take some time, but the strength is draining from the global warming scam.

We are moving into the end game.

Two Key House Dems Move to Block EPA Regulatory Authority - NYTimes.com

Two top House Democrats introduced a measure yesterday aimed at blocking U.S. EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gases, mirroring the controversial effort launched on the Senate side by Alaska Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

The measure from Agriculture Chairman Collin Peterson (Minn.) and Missouri's Ike Skelton was also co-sponsored by Missouri Republican Jo Ann Emerson.

Power Line - Global Warming Fraud: The Big Picture

The recent revelations of scientific errors (not to say fraud) in the U.N.'s global warming documents are important, but Fred Singer reminds us not to lose sight of the most important point: the IPCC's fundamental conclusions, relating to the allegedly unprecedented warming of the past half-century, are based on bad surface temperature data and are contradicted by more-reliable satellite data and by our knowledge of the earth's climate history. We know for a fact, in short, that the computer models that are the only basis for the AGW theory are wrong: