Errors in IPCC climate science » Blog Archive » Mike Haseler has a sage update on the BS that could result from Doha UN climate talks

So, even if the EU ratified immediately (is that legal?), the treaty could not come into effect until 5 other countries have ratified which is impossible in three weeks.

So, it is utter bullshit to talk about some treaty coming into force on the 31st December. It also beggars belief that the press will not figure this out. or question the point of the Doha treaty which does absolutely nothing for anyone anywhere.

And this is the reason I am writing. Unless sceptics make the point that the Doha treaty is Bullshit, the press will have no choice but to print the story as the green NGOs tell it.

It’s really up to you. It’s time the world heard the sceptic view on these talks!

Climate Changes Fades From Sandy Debate

One week after New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg lobbied Congress for disaster relief funding to supplement Sandy recovery efforts, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee considered the state of the recovery on Capitol Hill Tuesday, and the central question was the place and expense of the federal role in disaster recovery...
But the overarching problem at issue — that of climate change and the superstorms that scientists say will become more common as a result — was scarcely mentioned.

A complete economic transformation of the world - Minnesotans For Global Warming

[Monckton in Doha] Though the key bureaucratic global-warming profiteers here think "progress" is at last going to be achieved, there is a subdued air among everyone else. Very few came. Copenhagen in 2009, when almost 50,000 turned up, is a distant memory.
...
The trouble is that there has not been anything like enough global warming to keep the usual suspects safe in their cushy, taxpayer-funded sinecures. My innocent amusement for today was to visit several of the side-shows organized by the usual kooks who are drawn to these conferences like quacks to colored water. At each event I asked the obvious question:

"After 16 years without global warming, how confident are you that the official predictions of doom have not been overblown?"

A shrewish spokesman for the Gaia Foundation replied: "Why should we answer that? You're a well-known climate denier." Ma'am, 0 out of 10 for scientific rigor.