"I certainly hope that he will veto that now that the Canadians have publicly concluded that it is not safe to take a pipeline across British Columbia to ports on the Pacific," he told the Guardian. "I really can't imagine that our country would say: 'Oh well. Take it right over parts of the Ogallala aquifer', our largest and most important source of ground water in the US. It's really a losing proposition."Twitter / Foxgoose: You pay £100K subsidy for ..
Doug Proctor: How can IPCC projections play out in the real world? | Tallbloke's Talkshop
You pay £100K subsidy for each worker employed in wind industry (on top of paying their wages via your power bill) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/windpower/10122850/True-cost-of-Britains-wind-farm-industry-revealed.html …
somehow we must be able, within the IPCC mathematics, to jump 3C in the next 87 years. As well, the melting of continental glaciers must be able to increase within the IPCC math to crank sea level rise to about 20 mm/yr towards the end of the century.Warmist Amory Lovins: Fight global warming by making houses with solar bricks | JunkScience.com
The warmist community loves Amory Lovins, labeling him a physicist — even though he has no degree in the field.Maryland Gov. O’Malley: Cruise ship jobs more important than EPA air rules | JunkScience.com
And the enviros lambaste him for it.